Showing posts with label Accounting Errors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Accounting Errors. Show all posts

Wednesday, 15 June 2011

Understanding the good books…..


It seems that our friends at HMRC are using a trial scheme aimed at looking into whether SMEs are keeping adequate books and records to investigate other potential tax misdemeanours. A report in the Telegraph claims that far from being a pilot scheme designed to test out the checking process HMRC staff are already threatening to delve into the tax affairs of those it suspects of wrongdoing.

Naturally HMRC deny that this is the case. However the fact remains that once the pilot scheme is over HMRC will almost certainly be knocking on the door of tens of thousands of small businesses to check their accounting is up to scratch, and will no doubt seek to extract suitable penalties in cases where inadequate books and records have led to underpayment of tax.

Is this a cause for alarm? Hmm, that depends doesn’t it? If you have been keeping proper books and records you should have nothing to worry about, right? Well up to a point m’lud, up to a point.

It has been a constant source of amazement to me how poor some of the bookkeeping and accounting that I come across has been. As a part time finance director I normally start to get involved in a company some time after it has started to trade, and much of my initial work often involves unpicking a number of historical accounting and bookkeeping errors, in order to ensure that meaningful management information is available and that a clean compliant set of books exist should an opportunity to raise further funds or sell the business arise.

Well that’s understandable I hear you say. Entrepreneurs are rarely interested in bookkeeping and accounts. They are interested in finance (or raising it), they like cash and they have a reasonable idea of profit and pricing of their key products, but tidy books are not normally high on their list of priorities.

And yet that is not always the case. Many of these businesses have used bookkeepers and accountants from the start and they are still in a mess. To be fair, it is often the case that the management of the business simply do not listen to what their accounts team is telling them. However I think there is another key reason why problems arise in this area.

Bookkeeping is more than just maintaining books and records. Good bookkeeping and accounting requires an understanding of what those books and records are actually saying about how the business is performing and where it is going. Many businesses have their accounts prepared by people who simply do not have the ability to provide this support and advice.

Whilst it is clear that HMRC’s reasons for pushing this compliance review are tax revenue driven, there could be a positive side to all this. Ultimately it is in everybody’s interest to improve financial record keeping and reporting. Businesses that have good financial records and management reporting systems have a much better chance of survival. The benefits of doing so will go beyond keeping HMRC happy and off of your back.

Monday, 25 October 2010

Finance fall guys and unsung heroes…

Yet again a finance chief falls on his sword due to accounting errors. Holiday group TUI’s CFO Paul Bowtell has resigned as a result of the revelation that the company had to write off £117m of irreconcilable balances following its merger with First Choice in 2007. The differences, which led to the TUI share price falling 7%, were due to failures in combining the IT systems of the two businesses.

Internal balances are always a problem in large groups. It seems that when dealing with fellow subsidiaries, all good credit control procedures go out the window and internal politics takes over, leaving a trail of unreconciled and unagreed balances that can end up amounting to a sizeable sum of money.

Mind you it is funny how these accounting errors always result in a loss. I don’t recall ever having heard of a CFO being sacked for accounting errors that resulted in a profit even though the system that produced such profits would have been just as faulty as one that produced losses. Maybe they just overlook those sorts of errors (and perhaps the impact on executive bonuses…).

The above of course is a salutary reminder to us FDs how dependent we are on our systems and the people that operate them. Smaller businesses also often get into a mess because their bookkeeper or accounts team does not perform, or does not have sufficient understanding of the business to produce a proper set of numbers.

As an FD you can produce wonderful reports, charts and plans but they are meaningless unless the raw data is accurate and reliable. As I recently said to client, you can have the most sophisticated accounting and reporting system going, but if the input is not controlled, then the figures produced will be worthless. GIGO (Garbage In Garbage Out) in computer speak.

A good reliable accounts team or bookkeeping set up is worth its weight in gold and are the unsung heroes of an effective management reporting and control system. Make sure these people know what they are doing, and more importantly, why they are doing it, and your life as an FD becomes much easier.

Still at least Mr Bowtell did the honourable thing and resigned, as opposed to clinging on and blaming a few underlings. There is a lesson in that for someone somewhere……